Is Lee Harvey Oswald Innocent?

Here's the evidence to dispel the lie that Lee Oswald assassinated JFK?

Lee Oswald returning to the United States from Russsia with his wife, Marina.

Adolf Hitler said, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

While most people no longer believe the lie that Oswald managed to kill President Kennedy with an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano bolt action rifle, it never ceases to amaze me that with each new release of JFK files the Oswald story is resurrected, and the same old lies and far fetched musings do another circuit around the track. The ‘lone gunman’ theory is full of holes, and if we look closely enough, we can catch glimpses of a completely different underlying picture.

I first published this article on my website in 2013, revised and edited it in 2019. Now I present it here on Substack with a few added details to serve as a foundation upon which my deeper research into the Kennedy assassination can sit. From what I have discovered, we cannot expect the true assassin/s to emerge from any newly released files in a pristine state akin to the ‘magic bullet’ for there still persists a vested interest in keeping the truth hidden from us all. However, let that not deter us from investigating different scenarios more probable than the ‘lone nut’ fabrication fobbed onto us almost sixty-two years ago instead of the truth.

---

“Is Lee Harvey Oswald innocent?” is not a question many people would ask after he was dragged before the press as Kennedy’s assassin within hours of a much loved president’s death. While people were in shock over this unspeakable tragedy, an ‘official story’ was relentlessly repeated by the media until it became a form of brainwashing designed to silence such questions and firmly establish Oswald’s guilt in our minds. This was the ‘BIG LIE’ repeated and repeated – even in the face of inconvenient eye-witness accounts that proved otherwise.

People who told a different story were conveniently disposed of – a trend that finally caught my attention a full decade after the Twin Towers collapsed. If Oswald was indeed a ‘lone nut’ assassin who killed President Kennedy, why was there any need for a cover-up, strongly indicated in the following note by J. Edgar Hoover to White House aid Walter Jenkins just after Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby?

The thing I am concerned about, and so is Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin. ~ J. Edgar Hoover (FBI) to White House aide Walter Jenkins, November 24, 1963

Wow…”convince the public”? “real assassin”? Why? Had the Oswald ‘did it’ narrative already sprung too many leaks and was in danger of sinking? Too many people had heard a shot from the grassy knoll and looked up in time to see a puff of smoke under the trees, indicating the presence of a ‘second’ gunman. Of around 400 people lining both sides of Elm Street, the Warren Commission took testimony from 259.

Ninety were asked where they thought the shots came from. Fifty-eight said ‘the grassy knoll’. All fifty-eight were dismissed on the grounds that their recollections were mistaken.¹

Then on 25 November 1963, Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach wrote in a memo to President Johnson’s assistant Bill Moyers:

The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he had no confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

Clearly a cover-up was in play. What are they still trying to hide?

In this post, and the ones that flow from it, I will attempt to cut through the confusing jumble of ‘movie sets’ within ‘movie sets’, the tangled weave of actors invisibly transported between them using secret entrances and exits, and the false mirrors that distort the truth. I will reveal much of what remains hidden underneath such treachery, and why it is imperative that we know the truth of what happened on 22 November 1963. For instance, what did Jack Ruby mean when he told Earl Warren and Gerry Ford that “a whole new form of government” was about to occur?² But first, it may be helpful to know a little about why I am writing this post, and that I come to this unsolved mystery from a different perspective.

I was living in Australia and had just turned fifteen at the time President Kennedy was assassinated. I still vividly remember the state of dazed shock we were in that the popular president of America could be killed in such a traumatic way. In my world view only a crazy “lone nut” could be capable of such an insane act. This was not something a sane person would ever dream of doing. Right?

Needless to say, I swallowed the ‘official story’ whole that Oswald was “a lone nut” and had assassinated President Kennedy. It was beyond my comprehension that the government would lie, or the media reporting on such an unbelievable and shocking act would lie. What I couldn’t swallow so easily, however, was the excuse Jack Ruby gave that he had shot Oswald to spare Jackie Kennedy going through the tortures of a trial, had Oswald lived. Really?

How many of us would have thought at the time, “Hang on a minute, if Oswald was a ‘lone nut’ why would someone kill him? Was it to stop him talking? And if Ruby killed him to shut him up, what might he have said that Ruby didn’t want anyone to know? And then if Ruby knew something about Oswald killing the president, and why, would Oswald still be a ‘lone’ nut?” We could also ask, “Was Jack Ruby implicated in some other way in President Kennedy’s murder?”

I didn’t ask such questions at the time. The busyness of life – study, dating, marriage, raising a family – consumed my whole attention, so I didn’t think too much more about the untimely death of an American president. Much later in life I moved to New Zealand to take up a teaching position after some years of travel. More time slipped by until, early in 2013 one of the country’s best known broadcasting personalities, Paul Holmes, died of cancer. At his funeral his son quoted what former stand-up comedian Bill Hicks had said about life being “just a ride,” which is relevant here because I discovered during my hours of research that we were ‘taken for a ride’ the moment Lee Harvey Oswald was declared the ‘lone nut’ assassin and denied a trial to prove his innocence when he was shot and killed by Jacob Rubinstein, aka Jack Ruby.

The world is like a ride in an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it’s real because that’s how powerful our minds are. The ride goes up and down, around and around, it has thrills and chills, and it’s very brightly colored, and it’s very loud, and it’s fun for a while. Many people have been on the ride a long time, and they begin to wonder, “Hey, is this real, or is this just a ride?” And other people have remembered, and they come back to us and say, “Hey, don’t worry; don’t be afraid, ever, because this is just a ride.

Intrigued by this quote, I wanted to know more about Bill Hicks and searched for him on the Internet. I discovered that he had talked frequently about the Kennedy assassination, as if to wake people up that things were not as they seemed. One story he told that I remembered vividly, although I can no longer find it, went something like this:

“I have this mental image that every time a new president is elected, and after he’s sworn in on the White House lawn, he’s taken down into the White House basement…and he’s shown the film…the real film, of what happened that day at Dealey Plaza.”

Dealey Plaza? I was about to discover that this was where President Kennedy was assassinated. After watching the Bill Hicks video below, I just had to find out more about what happened that fateful day. And what did Bill Hicks mean when he said, “The real film”? I would later find out that the film to which he referred was the Zapruder film. But that will take us down a long rabbit hole, and I will explore this with you in another post as it exposes the real assassin.

For hours, days, months, and years I searched wherever my intuition and curiosity led me. Sometimes I stumbled on new leads while searching for something else. Exploring those leads lead me into the realm of disbelief, and I had to step back for awhile and let the dust settle from my collapsed world view. When I regained enough courage to override my fear, I pushed on. I will understand if you don’t want to know what I found because, quite frankly, it shocked me to the core.

The first thing that seriously concerned me and raised my alarms was that many witnesses met sudden, untimely, and even tragic deaths – often around the time they were required to give evidence before the Warren Commission, or the House Select Committee on Assassinations between 1976-1978.

Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence. Any man who has once proclaimed violence as his method is inevitably forced to take the lie as his principle. ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The first person to write about these deaths was William Penn Jones, Jr. He was a journalist who owned, and was editor of, the Midlothian Mirror, which was the only newspaper to cover the Ruby trial. After he read the Warren Commission’s findings he realized something was seriously amiss and began his own two-year investigation into the Kennedy assassination. In a video-recorded interview with Mark Lane (no longer available on the internet), Mr Jones mentioned witnesses who went into hiding, others he could not find, and some who were told not to talk about the assassination. For instance, he could not find Earleen Roberts after she testified before the Warren Commission. She had run the rooming house where Oswald was living under the name O.H. Lee.

Roberts informed the Warren Commission that just after Oswald entered the rooming house on November 22, at approximately one p.m., a police car drove up to the house at 1026 North Beckley and parked outside. The following was recorded in the Warren Commission Report, Vol. VI, pp 443, 444:

Q. Where was it parked?
Roberts: It was parked in the front of the house…
Q. Did this police car stop directly in front of your house?
Roberts: Yes – it stopped directly in front of my house…
Q. Where was Oswald when this happened?
Roberts: In his room…
Q. Were there two uniformed policemen in the car?
Roberts: Oh, yes.
Q. And one of the officers sounded the horn?
Roberts: Just a kind of ‘tit tit’ – twice.

Mark Lane commented that the Commission did not satisfactorily explain why a police car stopped in front of Oswald’s dwelling or why the policemen sounded the horn twice and then drove away just before he came out. Jones followed up to find out what happened to Earlene Roberts, which appears in an article, Disappearing Witnesses, he wrote for the January 1984 edition of The Rebel:

After testifying in Dallas in April 1964, Mrs. Roberts was subjected to intensive police harassment. They visited her at all hours of the day and night. Earlene complained of being “worried to death” by the police. She died on January 9, 1966 in Parkland Hospital (the hospital where President Kennedy was taken). Police said she suffered a heart attack in her home. No autopsy was performed.

Richard Belzer and David Wayne also became curious about the number of witness deaths and wrote a book, Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination published in 2013, covering the deaths of fifty people. In it they noted:

There were over seventy unnatural deaths out of approximately 1,400 witnesses during a fourteen-year period.

Note that: The correct odds of that occurring are 1-in-715 million trillion trillion.

That’s not our opinion; that’s the mathematical reality. ~ Richard Belzer and David Wayne, ‘Hit List’, 2013, p. 279

Why would so many witnesses die if Oswald was really a ‘lone nut’? I had to get to the bottom of this after reading about the numerous suicides and unnatural deaths that occurred before the 9/11 Commission interviews. What didn’t the Warren Commission want people to know? However, it was clear what they wanted people to believe:

1. That there was only one assassin (a lone nut).

2. Only three shots were fired.

3. All shots were fired from the ‘sniper’s nest’ on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, using a Italian Mannlicher-Carcano rifle.

4. Two bullets hit President Kennedy from behind: one went through his back, came out his throat and went on to hit Governor Connally in three places (known as the magic bullet), and the other hit the back of his head and came out at his right temple.

What caught my attention next was the controversy over the Altgen’s photo, cropped below with a photo of Oswald at the police station after his arrest on the right.

President Kennedy’s limousine is making its way down Elm Street, well past the entrance to the Texas School Book Depository. President Kennedy has just been hit by a bullet and has raised his arms. His fists are clenched as if reacting to something painful. This is the moment Governor John Connolly turned to his right to look back at Kennedy, but couldn’t see him. As he turned to look over his left shoulder, he was struck by a bullet. This action is clearly visible in the Zapruder film that no one ever thought the public would have access to, least of all on something like the Internet.

Some people pointed out that the man on the Texas School Book Depository entrance steps, known as ‘doorman’, is Lee Harvey Oswald (inside the red square). ‘Doorman’ appears to have reacted to something and is trying to see what is happening, judging by the way he is leaning with his left shoulder angling down and his left arm across his body as if holding onto something for support.

There is controversy over whether the photograph was altered to make it appear that Oswald is co-worker Billy Lovelady (for example, the receding hairline). But on closer inspection, to me the shirts ‘doorman’ is wearing confirm that ‘doorman’ is indeed Oswald. The over and under shirts hang identically on the body of ‘doorman’ when compared to the photograph at right and below after Oswald was arrested. The over shirt looks like it is linen with a distinct weave and lapel. Note also how loose-fitting it is (apparently Oswald had lost some weight prior to the assassination), and that some of the buttons were undone. Notice in the photograph below, that the old white t-shirt Oswald wore underneath it is clearly visible with its stretched neck that made it look like a v-neck from a distance. In fact, Oswald had a habit of pulling at the front of his tee shirts, which is obvious in this photo as the neck is stretched.

Photo by Tom Dillard/Dallas Morning News

But let me return for a moment to one of those ‘untimely witness deaths’: that of Billy Lovelady, who died of a fatal first heart attack at the young age of 41 – shortly after he testified for the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Of relevance here, the CIA does possess a weapon capable of shooting an undetectable poisonous dart to simulate a heart attack in its victim. This is just something to consider in the spate of witness deaths around this time.

Photograph of Billy Lovelady taken by the FBI on February 29, 1964 wearing the clothes he wore on November 22. © John Simkin, September 1997 – November 2013

But why would they want Lovelady dead? With so many people writing about ‘doorman’ being Oswald, maybe it was too much of a stretch to turn Oswald into Lovelady after all, and they needed to ‘disappear’ him. At least it would end awkward questions that Lovelady might provide the ‘wrong’ answers to, as is indicated below.

Billy Lovelady was apparently recorded as saying that he wore a long sleeved plaid shirt on November 22, but in the FBI Mugshots above he was wearing a short-sleeved, red-and-white-striped sport shirt. He explained that he was unaware that for these mugshots he had to wear the same shirt he was wearing on November 22. In fact, the truth of the matter is that Lovelady did wear a red and white striped shirt on November 22, 1963, as he stated for the Warren Commission (see below underlined).

Notice that Lovelady’s tee-shirt has a round, firm neck that covers his collarbone, which Oswald’s does not. Also, he routinely buttoned his shirts higher and didn’t wear them like Oswald wore his shirt on November 22. The FBI asked him to pose for several shots, finally getting him to wear a plaid shirt, and always directing him to wear his shirt unbuttoned halfway down the front.

The reasoning behind getting Lovelady to wear a plaid shirt was because the shirt worn by “doorman” formed a checkered effect when magnified in the original Altgen’s photo because of pixel degeneration. On the left below is Billy Lovelady with the shirt the FBI asked him to wear.

Below, the sleeves on each shirt are magnified at the same ratio. Note that the pixels degenerate on Oswald’s shirt to form a boxlike pattern, whereas there is no pixel distortion on Lovelady’s shirt. Judyth Vary Baker gives a detailed account of this at the end of Jim Fetzer’s article: JFK: Judyth Vary Baker cements Oswald in the Doorway.

Also take into account that Lovelady was heavier and about 3 inches shorter than Oswald. In the FBI mug shots, an attempt is made to make Lovelady’s face look narrower than it is by using more contrast and dark shading around the hairline, his right temple, and around the outline of his face, as below.

While it is not my aim to convince you or otherwise about Oswald’s shirt (you can find more comparisons here and a very detailed account here) it is a starting point to begin to question the ‘official story’. Clearly, Lovelady is not ‘doorman’, as the FBI would like you to believe. This is what lawyer Mark Lane had to say about the FBI’s investigation in his article, Oswald Innocent? A Lawyer’s Brief:

Most disquieting of all…is that the FBI, once wedded to a conclusion conceived before investigation, might be motivated to discover evidence which supports that conclusion. Within a few hours after Oswald was arrested the Dallas police, with the FBI at its side, announced the very same verdict now reinforced by the latest FBI discoveries. Under such circumstances, we fear that evidence tending to prove Oswald innocent might be discarded and evidence proving him guilty might be developed out of proportion or even created.

Clearly the FBI’s attempt to turn Lovelady into ‘doorman’ is a blatant example of their attempt to create a distorted picture of events, and discard any inconvenient truths. Several witnesses saw Oswald just before and after President Kennedy’s motorcade turned into Elm Street, and he was nowhere near the sixth floor. Oswald was emphatic and exasperated in his reply when questioned by reporters afterwards at the police station, “I’m just a patsy.” It was a truth no one wanted to hear or acknowledge.

And just as the FBI turned ‘doorman’ into Lovelady, so too did they change the Mauser rifle the police found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, and proudly displayed as the ‘murder weapon’, into an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that Oswald supposedly ordered through the post, leaving a paper trail that would incriminate him.

The following video shows how the Mauser rifle was found, and is narrated by witness Roger Craig who was a Deputy Sheriff at the time of the assassination. Immediately following the video is an affidavit signed by Seymour Weitzman, who was one of the officers present when the Mauser was found.

Weitzman later recanted his statement, but Craig refused. As a result Craig went from ‘Man of the Year’ in 1961 to losing his job in the Dallas Police Department after the Kennedy assassination. For sticking to the truth, no matter what, “he was harassed and threatened, stabbed, shot at, and his wife left him.” Finally in May 1975 he died of a massive gunshot wound to the chest - supposedly a suicide.³

What does this tell us about the Mannlicher-Carcano story? Of interest in the newly released files is a CIA connection to the company from which Oswald supposedly ordered this rifle. (See document at end of this post.)

A glimmer of truth came at last when I found the following Walter Cronkite interview of Lyndon Johnson at his ranch in 1969, where he admitted that “others” may have been involved in President Kennedy’s assassination. “Others” implies at least two or more people.

Walter Cronkite asked Johnson then whether he was satisfied there was no international conspiracy in the assassination.

Lyndon Johnson replied, “I can’t honestly say that I’ve ever been completely relieved of the fact that there might have been international connections… Well I have not fully discounted…

Mr Johnson went on to talk about the job the Warren Commission members did, and their merits, and ended saying:

I think they were competent and did the best they could. But I don’t think that they, or me, or anyone else is always absolutely sure of every…ah thing that might have motivated Oswald…or uh others…that uh…could have been involved.

This segment was deleted from the original broadcast of the interview at Mr Johnson’s request on the grounds of “national security.”

When Lyndon Johnson took over Kennedy’s presidency, the fear of communism spread like a fast growing cancer, finally extinguishing the hope for peace when he took America into the Vietnam War. Johnson even came to Australia to take our young men into the war as well, fooling us into believing a manufactured lie about the spread of communism. To this day I still remember the haunting slogan of his visit: “All the way with LBJ.”

Who was this war benefiting I now ask. Was it the Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned Americans about when he stepped down from his presidency? It now seems extremely suspicious to me that in less than a week of taking office, Kennedy’s decision to withdraw the troops from Vietnam was reversed.

Kennedy researcher, John Judge, fills us in on the exact day Kennedy’s plan to pull out of Vietnam was scrapped (in the video below beginning at 5:07). His mother worked at the Pentagon and her job was to project overall national drafts’ call figures five years in advance. She was told the new figures she would be dealing with on the Monday directly following JFK’s assassination. Exclaiming that the figures could not be right, she was told that “the war in Vietnam would last for 10 years and that 57,000 Americans would die, and to figure that in.”

Judge also reveals in the video the following at 6:33:

I also talked to SAC bomber pilots, Strategic Air Command bomber pilots who had the responsibility of nuclear and emergency response who were in the air on regular shifts, 24 hours a day. These were in the air over Wright Patterson Airforce Base when they heard the news that Kennedy had been shot. They ran to open lockers that contain a cryptographed code book that allows them to tell whether the president is calling them and to take orders that go all the way out to fail safe and nuclear war. There was not a pilot in the air that hour, over Wright Patt anyway – and I would contend this is the case everywhere else, nor is it isolated – that had a code book in that locker.

We know from Pierre Salinger’s book there was no code book aboard Air Force 2, bringing the entire cabinet back from important meetings that changed the course in Vietnam in the next few days. They were in the air and had no way to communicate with the White House or the president. There’s nobody that can touch those books besides the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the highest levels of defense intelligence, and at every level of my work, the Office of Navy Intelligence is who rears its head on the mechanic level, the defense industrial security command.

This is the background of Oswald, and Guy Banister and Jack Ruby when we go into them. And whatever is in the record will merely back that up. The physical evidence is already in front of us, so we know that one lone nut with an old gun that lost the war for the Italians in WWII, which couldn’t even shoot a bullet to line up with its own scope, didn’t do the damage in Dallas. But Kennedy wasn’t all that was killed that day, democracy died.”

That something had occurred within the highest echelons of power within the U.S., was backed up by the son of Pentagon insider, Colonel Christensen, who at that time was stationed to the Deputy Director of Plans. The son recalls (in this video at 2:54) that his father arrived home late and was visibly upset on the evening of Kennedy’s assassination. This is a transcript of what he recalled after his father arrived home:

On the evening of November 22, he arrived home late and visibly upset. I noted this because it was the first time I had ever seen my father so agitated. As the assassination was the topic of discussion at the dinner table, and we were talking about Oswald as the assassin, he listened shortly and then injected into the talk and corrected the family about who killed President Kennedy. He said that President Kennedy was assassinated by a military coup.

I recall responding, “That couldn’t be. Everybody knew it was Oswald because it was on T.V. news all day long since President Kennedy had been shot.” He reiterated that it was a military coup that killed President Kennedy, and added that he knew it because all secure communication lines in the Pentagon had been shut down the very second President Kennedy was assassinated and remained down for some hours, and no secure communications could be received or made out, but that calls could be made on non-secure lines. He added that only one person in the U.S. had the power to shut down secure communications in the Pentagon.

I recall asking if the boss at the Air Force, the General, could have made an order to have secure communications shut down or his bosses, and he asserted that no generals or military commanders had such power to shut down all secure communications of the Pentagon. He stated again, only one person in the United States had the power to shut down secure communications at the Pentagon, and that was the president. The discussion continued for a bit and my father was adamant about the military coup as a source of President Kennedy’s assassination.

Having watched the T.V. all that afternoon in school, as everybody froze in place at school and our classroom was riveted to the television, when my father revealed to us that evening about the military coup, I didn’t believe him. I didn’t understand military coups much either. I was twelve at the time. I did mark the conversation. It was the most unusual conversation at that point in my life.

It seems to me that “others” had a far greater motive and incentive to kill Kennedy that a “lone nut” who ‘defected’ to Russia. The truth of the matter is that Lee Oswald was far different from the ‘official portrait’ painted by the Warren Commission. Fletcher Prouty (head of Special operations at the Pentagon when Kennedy was assassinated) said of Lee Harvey Oswald, “He was no dud, don’t let anybody kid you.”⁴

Prouty was returning from the South Pole when JFK was assassinated, and had landed in Christchurch to headline news that Kennedy was dead. Since Kennedy died at 7 a.m. on 23 November, New Zealand time, he wondered how such detailed information about a possible assassin could find its way into a New Zealand newspaper so quickly. The ‘Oswald story’ in the bottom section of the front page aroused Prouty’s curiosity, and upon returning home he began to investigate, discovering that Oswald had not even been charged with a crime at the time of the Christchurch newspaper story.

Prouty found out that Oswald, up to that point, had an unusual but “pretty exemplary history.” He noted that he was the “crème of the crop,” as a marine or he would not have been selected to work at Atsugi, an underground base in Japan and the far-east headquarters of the CIA, and where he worked with the highly secret U2 spy planes sent over Russia.⁵

After Atsugi Oswald was sent to Russia, but in order to survive and carry out his mission there, he had to lay many false trails and create a misleading history for those curious enough to dig into his background.

And it was in preparation for the CIA’s “Big Event” organized by E. Howard Hunt, that Oswald had to again lay false trails of an assassination attempt on President Kennedy that would lead right to Castro’s doorstep. The CIA needed a pretext for the U.S. to go to war with Cuba.

In the following video Oswald is playing a pro-Castro role after he was filmed handing out leaflets promoting “Fair Play for Cuba,” during which he drew attention to himself by getting into a fight with a ‘bystander’, which landed him in jail overnight. All filming, including the following interview, were organized by Dr. Alton Ochsner through INCA (Information Council of the Americas), a right wing anti-Castro propaganda operation. Oh the irony.

I will let Senator John Tower have the final word on Oswald’s involvement in Kennedy’s assassination, told to Det. Sgt. Gary Wean of the Ventura Police Department:

…I must qualify Lee Harvey Oswald, he was none of the criminal things he’s accused of. He was an agent of the U.S. government acting under the specific orders of E. Howard Hunt.⁶

The reason why Tower told Wean about what he knew of the assassination and the “others” who were involved in it is explained by Dallas County Sheriff, Bill Decker, who arranged for them to meet in Ruidoso, NM. Decker told Wean over lunch on a visit to Los Angeles shortly after the assassination:

There’s a man in Dallas I’ve known a long time, he knows the entire truth about Oswald’s involvement. He’s scared to death to go to the Dallas PD or FBI. There’s been a double cross somewhere and everybody is scared shitless of everyone else. You would never believe all the accusations and crazy suspicions heaped on law enforcement in Texas by imbeciles in D.C. and the chaos it has created. This man feels that it is duty to tell someone what he knows in case something happens to him…”⁷

What should be of great interest to everyone is that John Tower wasn’t the only person who was “scared shitless” after the assassination, as shown in this newly released file of former intelligence agent, Gary Underhill, which also mentions a connection to Klein’s Sporting Goods of Chicago through a CIA friend, where Oswald supposedly purchased the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle through mail order.

While this is far from an exhaustive study of why Oswald is innocent, what I have presented here sows enough doubt that should Oswald have gone to trial for the assassination of President Kennedy, it would compel a jury to return a “Not Guilty” verdict.

---

Further Research into the Kennedy Assassination

Waco: A Former Hotbed for the Deep State’s Plans to Destroy America

How the 'Magic Bullet' Covered Up a Monumental Double Cross (Part 1)

How the 'Magic Bullet' Covered Up a Monumental Double Cross (Part 2)

JFK Assassination: Senator John Tower On How Hunt’s ‘Big Event’ Went Horribly Wrong

JFK Assassination: Rifle Range Realities Vs. the Oswald-Did-It Story

JFK Inherited the Biggest Political Cover-up in U.S. History

Notes and References

1. JFK Assassin Caught On Camera - Video

2. Belzer, Richard, and Wayne, David (2013) Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation Into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination, Skyhorse Publishing, Delaware, p. 42

3. The REBEL, Nov. 22, 1983

4. JFK and its Depiction of History – The panel debated Oliver Stone’s controversial film, JFK and its depiction of events surrounding the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas.

5. Ibid.

6. Gareth (Gary) L. Wean, p. 581, There’s A Fish In The Courthouse

7. Ibid., p. 580

This post is public so feel free to share it.